posted by Bina | Monday, July 16, 2007
Good piece here on how San Francisco Bay Area millionaires are taking their gold out of the Golden State.
“The Bay Area’s wealth boom is producing an explosion of millionaires–in Nevada, Wyoming and perhaps Canada. Wealth managers and other advisers to the well-heeled say “wealth migration”–taking the money and running–is behind a surprising drop in the number of Bay Area millionaires.”
The net loss of millionaires knocks the extremely rich and fertile Bay Area down near the bottom of a millionaire creation list with laggards such as Detroit, Pittsburgh and Cleveland.
Of course, the middle classes have been fleeing California for years. High house prices have been the main culprit. Long commutes and deteriorating public services are two more reasons.
But the flight of millionaires is something new. The reason? You guessed it. Taxes.
“I’m hearing from more California baby boomers, 'I need to get out,’ ” said Diane Kennedy, a Phoenix accountant and financial adviser to the wealthy. “You can still make a lot of money in California. The problem is, then you have to pay taxes on that money,” said Kennedy, who recently helped a California client with annual income of about $1 million save $96,000 annually by making their home in Jackson Hole, Wyo., their primary residence.
“Effectively, you have the state of California subsidizing their relocation through tax savings,” Kennedy said.
I love this story. Not of because of what it is doing to California. But because it proves that tax rates indeed influence behavior. Here's another great quote from the story:
“California is punishing people for being successful,” said a professor at Ohio University and a visiting scholar at the American Enterprise Institute.
No kidding. I would love to hear from readers who feel they are being punished for their success. Particularly, I would love to hear about your growing tax woes, combined with cost of living woes, in states such as California, New York, Massachusetts and others.
Have you moved for tax (and/or cost of living) reasons? Have you thought about such a move? Where would you go?
Post your comments below. Oh, and here’s a great book on the subject.
Sarkozy made the visit to announce that Paris might fall short of its objective of achieving a balanced budget by 2010, should gross domestic product growth fall below forecast. By doing so, he also forced the July 10 meeting of the U.N.'s Economic and Finance Committee to deliberate the merits of strict adherence to the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP)--a general commitment among European Union member states to achieve a budgetary position that is close to balance or in surplus over the medium term.
Sarkozy's visit was unprecedented but not unexpected. As a presidential candidate, he made it clear he would use fiscal policy to stimulate growth, and, once elected, he said he would communicate this to the Eurogroup. His self-invitation to the informal gathering prompted widespread speculation that the credibility of European fiscal coordination is again in doubt. This built on existing concerns caused by Sarkozy's criticism of the European Central Bank for ignoring the euro-dollar exchange rate and his insistence that market competition be omitted as an explicit objective of European integration in the negotiating mandate for a new E.U. Reform Treaty.
Media accounts also pointed to the debate between the European Commission and Italian Finance Minister Tomaso Padoa-Schioppa about the pace of fiscal consolidation in Italy.
However, such discussions about the credibility of European policy coordination (including fiscal policy) tend not to specify what is supposed to be credible, and for whom. The presumption is that the goal of European fiscal policy coordination is to ensure prudent management of government accounts. Should coordination fail, some accounts will be more prudently managed than others.
In such circumstances, financial markets, specifically those in long-term government debt, ought to react by demanding a greater risk premium on some long bond yields. Long-term government bond yields should converge where coordination is credible, and diverge where it is not.
However, the dispersion of euro-area government bond yields (excluding new entrant Slovenia) does not seem to bear this thesis out. While financial markets may simply be failing to exert sufficient discipline, another interpretation is that markets do not doubt the credibility of euro-area fiscal policy and expect that larger states will sometimes break the rules.
Moreover, it is not clear whether France ought to be singled out, as a comparison with the U.K. makes clear. While the U.K. is not an E.U. member, it is involved in fiscal policy coordination and is a signatory to the SGP. Moreover, of the two countries only London is under supervision for its failure to comply with the European requirement to "avoid excessive deficits," though this supervision is nonbinding, since the U.K. negotiated an opt-out when the procedure was negotiated.
By contrast, France emerged from the excessive deficits procedure last January, and, even if it delays its further consolidation of fiscal accounts, as has Sarkozy warned, there is no doubt about its continued avoidance of "excessive deficits." Paris' breach of the letter of the agreement is thus less serious than is supposed.
On the other hand, there is evidence that small countries, or countries eager to join the E.U., will put their commitment to prudent fiscal policy coordination first. An obvious example is the furious Dutch response to France and Germany's abrogation of 2003, shortly before the Netherlands came under supervision for its own excessive deficits the following spring. Similar behavior is also evident in recent efforts by Malta to qualify for membership in the euro area and by Hungary to fulfill its obligations (albeit very belatedly) under the excessive deficits procedure.
Sarkozy's warning on fiscal policy only reinforces widespread acceptance that large member states will pay more attention to domestic growth than to European rules. Yet that does not mean that smaller member states or candidates for the single currency will insist on doing the same, or that any government should miss the opportunity of strong growth to undertake prudent fiscal consolidation. The E.U. has moved away from unrealistic interpretations of the SGP. As a result, European commitment to fiscal policy coordination is more (and not less) credible.
In Europe the market for lending to private equity executives is estimated to be about €1bn ($1.37bn), with HBOS, Citigroup and Royal Bank of Scotland among the banks involved.
In the US market, thought to be bigger, JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank, Citigroup and RBS are said to be active.
In the rush to win buy-out titans as clients, some banks are offering them attractive terms, with unsecured loans that sometimes have no recourse against personal assets. Demand for loans to buy-out executives has emerged as the size of funds raised by private equity firms has ballooned in recent years.
Investors generally insist the professionals at a private equity firm put their own money into any fund they raise, usually equivalent to 1-5 per cent of the total. A 2 per cent investment by staff at Permira and Apax Partners, which both recently raised €11bn funds, would mean finding €220m between the executives.
“A 35 year old graduate of Harvard or Cambridge joining a top firm in 2002, who is asked to put money into funds in 2002, 2005 and 2007 while they also have school fees and a mortgage, is often being caught short,” said a top UK-based private banker.
“We can lend to them, killing two birds with one stone, both supporting our investment bank and looking after the top guys in the industry,” he said.
An executive at one of the UK’s biggest private equity firms said loans were mostly needed by the younger company members.
“Unless you have been a partner for three or four cycles, then the money you are asked for is very substantial, especially if you live in London, with a house, school fees and investments,” he said.
Source : www.ft.com
ABN Amro rose 3.9 per cent to €37.24 as Royal Bank of Scotland, up 2.3 per cent to 642p, sweetened the terms of its proposed bid for the Dutch lender.
While RBS kept its offer at €38.4-a-share, the bank raised the cash element of its €71.1bn proposal from 79 pert cent to 93 per cent.
The RBS move puts further pressure on Barclays agreed €35-a-share merger with ABN.
Barclays rose 1.5 per cent to 735p on hopes it would be taken off should the RBS bid succeed.
Other bank stocks also gained, with Alliance & Leicester up 3.7 per cent to £11.65 and Sociéte Générale 1.6 per cent higher at €138.11.
In the wider market, the FTSE Eurofirst 300 was up 3.59 points, or 0.2 per cent, to 1,630.9, its highest level since November 2000.
Elsewhere, Bayer rose 1.3 per cent to €57.05 as JPMorgan lifted its price target on the chemicals and pharmaceuticals group from €63 to €70.
Hennes & Mauritz gained 0.5 per cent to SKr 417.5 as comparable sales at the Swedish clothing chain rose 17 per cent in June.
Source : www.ft.com
I ask you to make your own job, how to earn dollar from internet, how to be rich, how to be succes? Join with me, earn much money. It's easy, i ask you to join with me on Google AdSense.
Sheep follow the herd blindly with their wallets open hoping someone else will will do their work for them. Jumping into the newest multi-level marketing program will drain your wallet and your faith in humanity.
You're checking out internet marketing? Great! Just be sure to market what you're passionate about so you don't bail off the ship at the first sign of crashing waves and high winds. There will be obstacles and the way to go through them is to be putting your time, energy and money into work you're passionate about.
Be smart. Don't join any program that hasn't been around and proven itself. There are a lot of programs popping up that look like you can join and make a lot of money from the "spill factor." It's a myth. I've been on the receiving end of that one and saw many others there with me. I even created a lot of spill and saw it go away a few months later.
Yes, you can make money from getting "spill," but the people who really benefit are the ones CREATING the spill. Not the receivers of the spill. Like everything in life, the fruits go to those who provide the labor.
Would you rather receive the benefits of being Bill Gates who created Microsoft or receive the benefits of getting welfare because you signed up for the program and chose not to work? (Which is the same as signing up for a multi-level program that you don't do any work on building yourself). Forget the money, which one is more satisfying to your soul?
Nothing against these programs, as with everything, 20% of the people involved make 80% of the money. That's true in every industry and yes, some people make a lot of money, but they work their butts off to get there. They deserve the money they EARN.
If you're looking for a free ride, it ain't gonna happen my friend. It takes commitment and a good work ethic to produce results no matter what you're doing.
A big problem with these programs is that almost everyone who jumps in is hoping to pay some cash in the hopes of cashing out like they bought a lottery ticket.
Business opportunities aren't lottery tickets. I know this flies against the lack of common sense used by the "biz op seeking herd of sheep," but it's the flat out truth. Do you know of ANY business that generated a lot of money without someone or many someone's putting in hard work?
Why would you expect anything less from a home based business? It's home based, but it's still a business. It's no less legitimate than a non-home-based business, the only difference is that you get a lot more money and freedom...once it's built. You have to build it. It doesn't build itself for you. And you have to do research on the business to make sure it's not a scam before you put down your cash or give up your credit card number.
Can you make money while you sleep? Definitely. Do you have to put in work and build a foundation, a reputation and...a business first? Definitely. Can you buy into some new program, advertise it for a week or two to see how it does and make a lot of money? Definitely not. Tire kickers don't make money with any business.
So what should you do? I invite you to look inside yourself, maybe look at what turned you on as a child and make money with something related to that. What did the acorn inside you do with all the free time you had as a child? Did you write, race, build, help others? Do what works for your soul.
I understand the pull to want to make money easily. I was pulled into that trap many times before I figured out that I had to do what felt more like play to me than work. Then I had to make a commitment to succeed and do everything possible to make it happen.
When you see a herd of sheep racing toward the "next big thing" exercise caution, slowly head in the other direction and don't try it out until you've given it a year to prove that it'll still be around. Otherwise your time, effort and money will have ran out to pasture with all the other sheep.
Instead, study leaders in the field you're interested in, copy what works for them (using your own unique style), and build a foundation that will get you to the bank with the most money. As our friend the tortoise showed us in his race against the hare, slow and steady wins the race every time.
source : internet-marketing.mcdar.net
2. Choose "tail". Remember, you must change your pick with zig-zag pattern! (You can choose "head" first, and at others games such as left & right, low & high, red & black and others, use same strategy with head & tail. It's only different name, but have same bet pattern!) Keep the zig-zag pattern until 14 times lose continually.
3. Click double or bet now!
4. Continue with e-gold payment process
5. Check the result. If win, repeat from step 1.
6. If lose, bet again with double of your lost. Use different choice with lose choice before (zigzag pattern). See table below. Example: You lost $0.05 with "tail", now you must bet $0.1 with "head"! So, if you win you still get profit even if you lose before! The calculation if win you get 2x (bet $0.1 get $0.2, profit $0.1 minus $0.05(lost before) you still get $0.05 profit !!!)
7. Repeat step 6 until you win. You can stop if you feel you have enough lost that you cannot afford to lose.
8. REMEMBER : DON'T PUSH YOUR LUCK !!!
There are not many Forex tips that are more important than that of training and knowledge. While there are many professionals who will be willing to help you on your way, it is important that the final say on the matters will be yours. Hence, when you do invest, know the ins and outs of the market, and take the power into your own hands. Another of tips of Forex is that you invest wisely and take advantage of the technology available to you in the market, since most trades are made online. All you have to do in order to make a trade is go online, and there you will find all the resources that you will need. While you are investing, it may be a good idea to will you children some money, as well.
What to sell
One thing that can be sold on the web is access to information! This usually comes in the form of subscriptions to newsletters, or sales of books or reports. Check out these report titles for example. One advantage of selling information, or access to the information, is that these can be delivered electronically. This means there is no product to manufacture or ship. All you need to do is set up a mechanism for delivering the content, such as a web site, and everything (except marketing) takes care of itself.
People crave information that appeals to their basic needs and will somehow educate or enlighten them. Simply by putting your own specialized information into e-books, manuals, reports, e-zines or newsletters, you can start putting a hefty price on information you have no doubt been giving away. Makes sense doesn't it?
If you are able to communicate an idea to another person, then you've got what it takes to be an e-author. All you have to do is write down that idea (or a couple of them) and publish it as an e-book. After that, just set up a website and start marketing your product. That's it! You could be making a lot of money in no time! Sounds good right?
“The Bay Area’s wealth boom is producing an explosion of millionaires–in Nevada, Wyoming and perhaps Canada. Wealth managers and other advisers to the well-heeled say “wealth migration”–taking the money and running–is behind a surprising drop in the number of Bay Area millionaires.”
The net loss of millionaires knocks the extremely rich and fertile Bay Area down near the bottom of a millionaire creation list with laggards such as Detroit, Pittsburgh and Cleveland.
Of course, the middle classes have been fleeing California for years. High house prices have been the main culprit. Long commutes and deteriorating public services are two more reasons.
But the flight of millionaires is something new. The reason? You guessed it. Taxes.
“I’m hearing from more California baby boomers, 'I need to get out,’ ” said Diane Kennedy, a Phoenix accountant and financial adviser to the wealthy. “You can still make a lot of money in California. The problem is, then you have to pay taxes on that money,” said Kennedy, who recently helped a California client with annual income of about $1 million save $96,000 annually by making their home in Jackson Hole, Wyo., their primary residence.
“Effectively, you have the state of California subsidizing their relocation through tax savings,” Kennedy said.
I love this story. Not of because of what it is doing to California. But because it proves that tax rates indeed influence behavior. Here's another great quote from the story:
“California is punishing people for being successful,” said a professor at Ohio University and a visiting scholar at the American Enterprise Institute.
No kidding. I would love to hear from readers who feel they are being punished for their success. Particularly, I would love to hear about your growing tax woes, combined with cost of living woes, in states such as California, New York, Massachusetts and others.
Have you moved for tax (and/or cost of living) reasons? Have you thought about such a move? Where would you go?
Post your comments below. Oh, and here’s a great book on the subject.
Labels: money
posted by Bina | French President Nicolas Sarkozy made an unprecedented appearance at the informal meeting of the "Eurogroup"--the economics and finance ministers of the euro-area countries--on July 9.Sarkozy made the visit to announce that Paris might fall short of its objective of achieving a balanced budget by 2010, should gross domestic product growth fall below forecast. By doing so, he also forced the July 10 meeting of the U.N.'s Economic and Finance Committee to deliberate the merits of strict adherence to the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP)--a general commitment among European Union member states to achieve a budgetary position that is close to balance or in surplus over the medium term.
Sarkozy's visit was unprecedented but not unexpected. As a presidential candidate, he made it clear he would use fiscal policy to stimulate growth, and, once elected, he said he would communicate this to the Eurogroup. His self-invitation to the informal gathering prompted widespread speculation that the credibility of European fiscal coordination is again in doubt. This built on existing concerns caused by Sarkozy's criticism of the European Central Bank for ignoring the euro-dollar exchange rate and his insistence that market competition be omitted as an explicit objective of European integration in the negotiating mandate for a new E.U. Reform Treaty.
Media accounts also pointed to the debate between the European Commission and Italian Finance Minister Tomaso Padoa-Schioppa about the pace of fiscal consolidation in Italy.
However, such discussions about the credibility of European policy coordination (including fiscal policy) tend not to specify what is supposed to be credible, and for whom. The presumption is that the goal of European fiscal policy coordination is to ensure prudent management of government accounts. Should coordination fail, some accounts will be more prudently managed than others.
In such circumstances, financial markets, specifically those in long-term government debt, ought to react by demanding a greater risk premium on some long bond yields. Long-term government bond yields should converge where coordination is credible, and diverge where it is not.
However, the dispersion of euro-area government bond yields (excluding new entrant Slovenia) does not seem to bear this thesis out. While financial markets may simply be failing to exert sufficient discipline, another interpretation is that markets do not doubt the credibility of euro-area fiscal policy and expect that larger states will sometimes break the rules.
Moreover, it is not clear whether France ought to be singled out, as a comparison with the U.K. makes clear. While the U.K. is not an E.U. member, it is involved in fiscal policy coordination and is a signatory to the SGP. Moreover, of the two countries only London is under supervision for its failure to comply with the European requirement to "avoid excessive deficits," though this supervision is nonbinding, since the U.K. negotiated an opt-out when the procedure was negotiated.
By contrast, France emerged from the excessive deficits procedure last January, and, even if it delays its further consolidation of fiscal accounts, as has Sarkozy warned, there is no doubt about its continued avoidance of "excessive deficits." Paris' breach of the letter of the agreement is thus less serious than is supposed.
On the other hand, there is evidence that small countries, or countries eager to join the E.U., will put their commitment to prudent fiscal policy coordination first. An obvious example is the furious Dutch response to France and Germany's abrogation of 2003, shortly before the Netherlands came under supervision for its own excessive deficits the following spring. Similar behavior is also evident in recent efforts by Malta to qualify for membership in the euro area and by Hungary to fulfill its obligations (albeit very belatedly) under the excessive deficits procedure.
Sarkozy's warning on fiscal policy only reinforces widespread acceptance that large member states will pay more attention to domestic growth than to European rules. Yet that does not mean that smaller member states or candidates for the single currency will insist on doing the same, or that any government should miss the opportunity of strong growth to undertake prudent fiscal consolidation. The E.U. has moved away from unrealistic interpretations of the SGP. As a result, European commitment to fiscal policy coordination is more (and not less) credible.
Labels: money
posted by Bina | Private banks are rushing into a surprising new market: lending to high-flying private equity executives who are strapped for cash to invest in their own funds.In Europe the market for lending to private equity executives is estimated to be about €1bn ($1.37bn), with HBOS, Citigroup and Royal Bank of Scotland among the banks involved.
In the US market, thought to be bigger, JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank, Citigroup and RBS are said to be active.
In the rush to win buy-out titans as clients, some banks are offering them attractive terms, with unsecured loans that sometimes have no recourse against personal assets. Demand for loans to buy-out executives has emerged as the size of funds raised by private equity firms has ballooned in recent years.
Investors generally insist the professionals at a private equity firm put their own money into any fund they raise, usually equivalent to 1-5 per cent of the total. A 2 per cent investment by staff at Permira and Apax Partners, which both recently raised €11bn funds, would mean finding €220m between the executives.
“A 35 year old graduate of Harvard or Cambridge joining a top firm in 2002, who is asked to put money into funds in 2002, 2005 and 2007 while they also have school fees and a mortgage, is often being caught short,” said a top UK-based private banker.
“We can lend to them, killing two birds with one stone, both supporting our investment bank and looking after the top guys in the industry,” he said.
An executive at one of the UK’s biggest private equity firms said loans were mostly needed by the younger company members.
“Unless you have been a partner for three or four cycles, then the money you are asked for is very substantial, especially if you live in London, with a house, school fees and investments,” he said.
Source : www.ft.com
Labels: money
posted by Bina | European shares hit fresh six-and-a-half year highs on Monday amid gains in the financials sector.ABN Amro rose 3.9 per cent to €37.24 as Royal Bank of Scotland, up 2.3 per cent to 642p, sweetened the terms of its proposed bid for the Dutch lender.
While RBS kept its offer at €38.4-a-share, the bank raised the cash element of its €71.1bn proposal from 79 pert cent to 93 per cent.
The RBS move puts further pressure on Barclays agreed €35-a-share merger with ABN.
Barclays rose 1.5 per cent to 735p on hopes it would be taken off should the RBS bid succeed.
Other bank stocks also gained, with Alliance & Leicester up 3.7 per cent to £11.65 and Sociéte Générale 1.6 per cent higher at €138.11.
In the wider market, the FTSE Eurofirst 300 was up 3.59 points, or 0.2 per cent, to 1,630.9, its highest level since November 2000.
Elsewhere, Bayer rose 1.3 per cent to €57.05 as JPMorgan lifted its price target on the chemicals and pharmaceuticals group from €63 to €70.
Hennes & Mauritz gained 0.5 per cent to SKr 417.5 as comparable sales at the Swedish clothing chain rose 17 per cent in June.
Source : www.ft.com
Labels: money
posted by Bina | Friday, June 29, 2007 Anytime, anywhere, now it's so hard to found some job with our title of college. It's so hard to found jobs conform with title of college.I ask you to make your own job, how to earn dollar from internet, how to be rich, how to be succes? Join with me, earn much money. It's easy, i ask you to join with me on Google AdSense.
- What is Google AdSense?
Google AdSense is a hotest publisher at this time. Google AdSense ask your blog or website to join and publish they ads. Google AdSense is hotest publisher because they program paying you each click, and they pay you $ 0,5 up to $ 1,50 per click, maybe more than its. - What you must have?
This is you must have, before start and join with Google AdSense :
Email
Before start and join with Google AdSense you must have an email. Email is very important when you joined programs on internet. Don't have any email? I give you two alternative, yahoo mail or bluebottle. To sign-up yahoo click here www.yahoo.com, and to sign-up bluebottle click here www.bluebottle.com.
Blog or Website
Before start and join with Google AdSense, you must have blog or website. To have an website maybe is very difficult, you must buy some domain and hosting, upload your script, it's very difficult. I give you another way, you choose to have an blog. It's free, claim your blog now, click here www.blogger.com. After you create your blog, fill your blog with some posts, you must posting with english language to have perfect ads, not public servise ads. - Join With Google AdSense!
Last step after you finish all step up, is join with Google AdSense. To join with Google AdSense you must be click the link below :After join, log-in with your Google AdSense ID and password. Click " AdSense setup "
Labels: money
posted by Bina | Tuesday, May 29, 2007 Remember that leaders spend more money on learning and growing, but they do their homework and work hard to make money.Sheep follow the herd blindly with their wallets open hoping someone else will will do their work for them. Jumping into the newest multi-level marketing program will drain your wallet and your faith in humanity.
You're checking out internet marketing? Great! Just be sure to market what you're passionate about so you don't bail off the ship at the first sign of crashing waves and high winds. There will be obstacles and the way to go through them is to be putting your time, energy and money into work you're passionate about.
Be smart. Don't join any program that hasn't been around and proven itself. There are a lot of programs popping up that look like you can join and make a lot of money from the "spill factor." It's a myth. I've been on the receiving end of that one and saw many others there with me. I even created a lot of spill and saw it go away a few months later.
Yes, you can make money from getting "spill," but the people who really benefit are the ones CREATING the spill. Not the receivers of the spill. Like everything in life, the fruits go to those who provide the labor.
Would you rather receive the benefits of being Bill Gates who created Microsoft or receive the benefits of getting welfare because you signed up for the program and chose not to work? (Which is the same as signing up for a multi-level program that you don't do any work on building yourself). Forget the money, which one is more satisfying to your soul?
Nothing against these programs, as with everything, 20% of the people involved make 80% of the money. That's true in every industry and yes, some people make a lot of money, but they work their butts off to get there. They deserve the money they EARN.
If you're looking for a free ride, it ain't gonna happen my friend. It takes commitment and a good work ethic to produce results no matter what you're doing.
A big problem with these programs is that almost everyone who jumps in is hoping to pay some cash in the hopes of cashing out like they bought a lottery ticket.
Business opportunities aren't lottery tickets. I know this flies against the lack of common sense used by the "biz op seeking herd of sheep," but it's the flat out truth. Do you know of ANY business that generated a lot of money without someone or many someone's putting in hard work?
Why would you expect anything less from a home based business? It's home based, but it's still a business. It's no less legitimate than a non-home-based business, the only difference is that you get a lot more money and freedom...once it's built. You have to build it. It doesn't build itself for you. And you have to do research on the business to make sure it's not a scam before you put down your cash or give up your credit card number.
Can you make money while you sleep? Definitely. Do you have to put in work and build a foundation, a reputation and...a business first? Definitely. Can you buy into some new program, advertise it for a week or two to see how it does and make a lot of money? Definitely not. Tire kickers don't make money with any business.
So what should you do? I invite you to look inside yourself, maybe look at what turned you on as a child and make money with something related to that. What did the acorn inside you do with all the free time you had as a child? Did you write, race, build, help others? Do what works for your soul.
I understand the pull to want to make money easily. I was pulled into that trap many times before I figured out that I had to do what felt more like play to me than work. Then I had to make a commitment to succeed and do everything possible to make it happen.
When you see a herd of sheep racing toward the "next big thing" exercise caution, slowly head in the other direction and don't try it out until you've given it a year to prove that it'll still be around. Otherwise your time, effort and money will have ran out to pasture with all the other sheep.
Instead, study leaders in the field you're interested in, copy what works for them (using your own unique style), and build a foundation that will get you to the bank with the most money. As our friend the tortoise showed us in his race against the hare, slow and steady wins the race every time.
source : internet-marketing.mcdar.net
Labels: money
posted by Bina | Thursday, May 24, 2007 1. Choose the minimum bet $0.05 (If the minimum bet is $1, start with the 5th row in table below and then minus the total lost with $0.85 so it become only $1, $3, $7... And the profit become bigger...)2. Choose "tail". Remember, you must change your pick with zig-zag pattern! (You can choose "head" first, and at others games such as left & right, low & high, red & black and others, use same strategy with head & tail. It's only different name, but have same bet pattern!) Keep the zig-zag pattern until 14 times lose continually.
3. Click double or bet now!
4. Continue with e-gold payment process
5. Check the result. If win, repeat from step 1.
6. If lose, bet again with double of your lost. Use different choice with lose choice before (zigzag pattern). See table below. Example: You lost $0.05 with "tail", now you must bet $0.1 with "head"! So, if you win you still get profit even if you lose before! The calculation if win you get 2x (bet $0.1 get $0.2, profit $0.1 minus $0.05(lost before) you still get $0.05 profit !!!)
7. Repeat step 6 until you win. You can stop if you feel you have enough lost that you cannot afford to lose.
8. REMEMBER : DON'T PUSH YOUR LUCK !!!
Labels: money
posted by Bina | Wednesday, May 16, 2007 The Forex market is among the most advantageous and profitable in the world, and is worth more than a trillion and a half dollars a day! With all that money going around, it makes sense to get in on the action. There are a few things that you should remember, however, before you invest large sums of money in the enterprise. Here are a few tips to help you on your way.There are not many Forex tips that are more important than that of training and knowledge. While there are many professionals who will be willing to help you on your way, it is important that the final say on the matters will be yours. Hence, when you do invest, know the ins and outs of the market, and take the power into your own hands. Another of tips of Forex is that you invest wisely and take advantage of the technology available to you in the market, since most trades are made online. All you have to do in order to make a trade is go online, and there you will find all the resources that you will need. While you are investing, it may be a good idea to will you children some money, as well.
Labels: money
posted by Bina | There are lots of ways you can make money on the Internet. You can sell things via classified ads, auctions or even create your own web site to sell your products or services. Creating and selling your own e-books is one excellent idea.What to sell
One thing that can be sold on the web is access to information! This usually comes in the form of subscriptions to newsletters, or sales of books or reports. Check out these report titles for example. One advantage of selling information, or access to the information, is that these can be delivered electronically. This means there is no product to manufacture or ship. All you need to do is set up a mechanism for delivering the content, such as a web site, and everything (except marketing) takes care of itself.
People crave information that appeals to their basic needs and will somehow educate or enlighten them. Simply by putting your own specialized information into e-books, manuals, reports, e-zines or newsletters, you can start putting a hefty price on information you have no doubt been giving away. Makes sense doesn't it?
If you are able to communicate an idea to another person, then you've got what it takes to be an e-author. All you have to do is write down that idea (or a couple of them) and publish it as an e-book. After that, just set up a website and start marketing your product. That's it! You could be making a lot of money in no time! Sounds good right?
Labels: money
